Astrology is an engineering act

This is subject which needs some understanding of astrology. It is not about getting the prediction, rather it is the prediction methodology is mature engineering methods and how astrology is part of engineering.

As an engineer I have the habit of looking details in an engineers eye. I found astrology uses many of the engineering techniques. This is the list of things why I think astrology is an engineering subject

1) Horoscope: What is horoscope? It is the snapshot of the universe when a person is born with the place of birth being the center of the universe. It tells you the relative position of planets with respect to the place where the person is born. Engineers use the maps more than others, so astrologers use engineering to get somebody's details. The same goes for prediction of a year or horray astrology. The crux of prediction is the relative position of planets.

2) Pattern recognition: Astrology uses pattern matching to predict the details. It uses patterns to figure out which house belongs to whom and how to predict based on the position of a planet at a specific position. This is pattern which is defined and its practiced based on pattern matching.

3) Separation of concern: Astrology uses separation of concern to predict the certain details. If you want to look at the age of a person look at 8th house, for property look at the 4th house and so on.

4) Derivation: It uses derivation to find out the responsibility of each house. 12th house is the house for expenditure. 12th to 12th is 11th house is the house of expenditure of expenditure (savings). 5th house is the house for first child. So 5th to 5th 9th house is the house of grand children and so on.

I will add more details in future.

Is India for Indians?

Rahul Gandhi said India is for Indians, and 99 percent people think it. I am with him in the first statement. I have no idea about the second statement and wish it were true. I want to know a little more deeper about his thought. Whether he is meaning Mumbai is for Biharis(No insult to Bihari brothers, you are fantastic set of people) or India is for Indians? In case he is talking India is for Indians, what are the places belong to India?

I know Kashmir is not for Indians, and for Kashmiris. Article 370 separates it from rest of India. Kashmir is even not for Kashmir Hindus who were thrown out from the place. Mr Syama Prasad Mookerjee was killed in Kashmir for visiting it. Does Mr Gandhi think in line with Mr Mukerjee? Or he just thinks Mr Abdullah was right in impriosioning Mr Mukerjee and Kashmir is not for Indians.

Mr Gandhi is more interested about Bihar and UP votes (Congress performed very badly in UP and Bihar since 1993). He is least interested with India is for Indians. I would salute him, if he can tell the same thing in Kashmir or Nagaland.