Rahul Gandhi said India is for Indians, and 99 percent people think it. I am with him in the first statement. I have no idea about the second statement and wish it were true. I want to know a little more deeper about his thought. Whether he is meaning Mumbai is for Biharis(No insult to Bihari brothers, you are fantastic set of people) or India is for Indians? In case he is talking India is for Indians, what are the places belong to India?
I know Kashmir is not for Indians, and for Kashmiris. Article 370 separates it from rest of India. Kashmir is even not for Kashmir Hindus who were thrown out from the place. Mr Syama Prasad Mookerjee was killed in Kashmir for visiting it. Does Mr Gandhi think in line with Mr Mukerjee? Or he just thinks Mr Abdullah was right in impriosioning Mr Mukerjee and Kashmir is not for Indians.
Mr Gandhi is more interested about Bihar and UP votes (Congress performed very badly in UP and Bihar since 1993). He is least interested with India is for Indians. I would salute him, if he can tell the same thing in Kashmir or Nagaland.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment